2. REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
The Regional Development Strategy (RDS) sets Councils overall direction for growth in Ottawa-Carleton to 2021 and includes policies to achieve the desired growth pattern. The policies include land use designations and infrastructure phasing to help Council ensure the long-term economic, social and environmental health of Ottawa-Carleton.
The RDS is consistent with Ottawa-Carletons July 1995 Community Vision of "a region of communities that is environmentally healthy, safe, caring, prosperous and diverse." The RDS addresses the following aspects of the Vision:
The RDS was further evaluated and refined through a series of 18 strategic scenarios, each of which was rated against three dozen criteria reflecting economic, environmental and social considerations. A second, more detailed phase of evaluation analysed a smaller number of scenarios to determine the best balance of urban residential development inside and outside the Greenbelt.
The RDS deals primarily with the servicing and phasing of urban development in Ottawa-Carleton. Other important policies in this Plan also form part of the overall strategy for development, for example, policies to protect major resource areas for agricultural, mineral resource and other uses, but they are not explicitly addressed in this section.
2.1 PROJECTED GROWTH IN OTTAWA-CARLETON
The RDS is based on the assumption that the population of Ottawa-Carleton will be slightly over one million people in 2021. Households and jobs associated with this level of growth are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1
Projected Growth in Ottawa-Carleton to 2021
1971 |
1981 |
1991 |
2001 |
2011 |
2021 |
|
| Population | 472,000 |
547,000 |
678,000 |
790,000 |
904,000 |
1,015,000 |
| Households | 138,000 |
200,000 |
260,000 |
310,000 |
370,000 |
432,000 |
| Jobs | 214,000 |
292,000 |
383,000 |
460,000 |
550,000 |
580,000 |
Projections show that most future population growth will occur among those 40 years of age and older as a result of the aging of the post-war baby boom. This will have profound effects on the housing and labour markets within the region over the next 25 years. The demographic shift implies a slowing in the rate of population and employment growth in the region as the population ages and labour force participation in full-time jobs declines.
2.2 THE CONTEXT FOR DEVELOPMENT
This direction for growth has been adopted in response to several important factors:
2.3 GUIDING THE DIRECTION OF GROWTH
The objectives of the RDS are:
2.4 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND SERVICING
Regional development policies direct development to areas where existing urban infrastructure has spare capacity. These areas, which are cost-effective to service with piped services and transportation, offer the best potential for future employment growth and meet other criteria for an environmentally, economically and socially balanced region. The analysis of alternative growth scenarios concluded that the most beneficial area for further development was the urban area inside the Greenbelt (shown in Figure 2). However, the RDS also provides a choice for those who want to live outside the Greenbelt in either an urban or rural environment.
In order not to preclude additional employment growth which may be desirable regionally, provincially and nationally, the Plan provides more land for employment growth than is required to meet the projection. This allows for competition among locations which should help reduce land costs.
The Plan also designates more land for residential use than is required within the planning horizon. Again, this provision is intended to foster competition and help reduce housing prices.
Targets for occupied dwelling unit and population allocations in urban areas inside and outside the Greenbelt and in the rural area, are shown in Table 2. These targets allow for roughly equal shares of new housing to be located in urban areas inside and outside the Greenbelt over the 1991-2021 period. However, because the average number of people per household is lower inside the Greenbelt, these areas are expected to receive only 25 to 30 percent of Ottawa-Carletons future population growth, while urban areas outside the Greenbelt will absorb about 60 percent. Approximately 10 percent of new dwelling units and 11 percent of future population are planned for the rural areas of Ottawa-Carleton, reflecting their historic share of growth through the 1980s. Targets for housing and population growth inside the Greenbelt are shown as a range which is reflected in the total amount of development anticipated in Ottawa-Carleton.
Figure 2
Urban Areas In Ottawa-Carleton

Note: Urban areas illustrated as "inside the Greenbelt" include all lands
inside the inner boundary of the Greenbelt and Blackburn Hamlet and Bells Corners,
but do not include any land designated as Greenbelt on Schedules A and B of this Plan.
Table 2
General Regional Development Pattern for 2021
| Area | Dwelling Units |
Population |
| Urban Inside Greenbelt | 265,000 - 277,000 |
555,000 - 575,000 |
| Urban Outside Greenbelt | 116,000 |
335,000 |
| Rural | 39,000 |
105,000 |
| Total Ottawa-Carleton | 420,000 - 432,000 |
995,000 - 1,015,000 |
Note: Population increase is approximate and depends on future average household size in both new and existing occupied dwelling units in individual areas.
The share of residential development inside the Greenbelt is expected to increase over the planning period as the population ages and the demand for multiple-unit housing closer to services and amenities grows. The share of units built inside the Greenbelt has changed remarkably little since 1981, as shown in Table 3. Although the current demographic situation still favours suburban areas outside the Greenbelt, long-term demographic trends suggest a gradual increase in development inside the Greenbelt. Consequently, policy 1 of Section 2.4.1. aims for an increase in the share of units built inside the Greenbelt in each period after 2001.
2.4.1 Policies
To guide the direction of development, Council shall:
Table 3
Guidelines for Additional Dwellings by Area
| Area | 1976-1981 | 1981-1986 | 1986-1991 | 1991-1996 | 1996-2001 | 2001-2006 | 2006-2011 | 2011-2021 |
| Inside Greenbelt | 64% |
46% |
45% |
42% |
40% |
45% |
50% |
53% |
| Urban Outside GB | 30% |
42% |
44% |
48% |
50% |
45% |
40% |
37% |
| Rural | 6% |
12% |
11% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
| Total RMOC | 100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Note: Figures based on approximately 277,000 units inside the Greenbelt by 2021
Table 4
Development Pattern by Area - 2021
| Area | 2021 Dwelling Units |
| Inside the Greenbelt | 265,000-277,000 |
| Kanata Urban Centre | 32,000 |
| Orléans Urban Centre | 38,000 |
| Nepean South Urban Centre | 27,000 |
| Gloucester South Urban Centre | 8,000 |
| Stittsville * | 8,500 (Appeal 20,28) |
| Leitrim | 2,500 |
| Rural | 39,000 |
| TOTAL | 420,000-432,000 (Appeal 20,28) |
* With respect to Stittsville, the totals respecting Phase 1, Phase 2 and Build-Out Post 2021 are in force, on an interim basis, subject only to pending appeals seeking an increase thereto. [OMB Modification, November 6, 1998]
3. Maintain approximately five-years supply of vacant urban residential land that is provided with trunk sewer and water services throughout Ottawa-Carleton.
4. In applying policy 3, ensure the five-year supply is not concentrated in any one
single area of Ottawa-Carleton, by maintaining sufficient trunk sewer and water services
for development inside the Greenbelt and in at least three of the five urban areas outside
the Greenbelt, defined as:
a) Kanata Urban Centre/Stittsville;
b) Orléans Urban Centre;
c) Nepean South Urban Centre;
d) Gloucester South Urban Centre;
e) Leitrim.
For the purposes of applying the above policy, it is not required that each of these
areas individually has a five-year supply.
5. Ensure that planning policies and zoning by-laws provide opportunities for jobs in the ratio of 1.1 jobs per household in each urban area outside the Central Area. For the purposes of this policy, Kanata and Stittsville are considered to be a single urban area. Zoning by-laws shall provide for a reasonable level of employment in Stittsville, although the 1.1 ratio is not expected to be achieved.
6. Consider an amendment to this Plan to redesignate land designated South Urban Centre
Future Development on Schedules A and B to allow urban development. The amendment shall be
supported by studies which address the following matters:
a) the timing of need for additional urban land in Ottawa-Carleton;
b) the adequacy of existing and planned improvements to the water, wastewater, road and transit systems to serve the proposed development;
c) the financial impact to RMOC of services required and the cost-effectiveness of the proposed development relative to other choices;
d) opportunities for economic development and achievement of a balance of jobs and housing;
e) provision of a range of housing opportunities;
f) impact on resource areas and the natural environment;
g) other studies as required in this Plan, such as those dealing with stormwater management.
7. Maintain good-quality farmland in agricultural production on lands shown as South Urban Centre Future Development for as long as possible. Uses permitted on the lands designated South Urban Centre Future Development are those permitted in Agricultural Resource Areas.
8. Redesignate the Kanata North Expansion Area shown on Schedule B to allow urban
development to proceed, subject to studies which address the matters outlined below to the
satisfaction of Council. In the event that the studies are not completed to the
satisfaction of Council, the lands shall be redesignated to General Rural. The studies
shall address the:
a) provision of transportation and other infrastructure which fulfills Regional and local functions;
b) mix and variety of housing types;
c) variety of employment opportunities;
d) Environmental Impact Study for lands within 120 metres of the South March Highlands/Wetlands to be completed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Natural Resources;
e) phasing of development related to both the provision and the cost of providing transportation and other infrastructure;
f) policy approaches which Council might wish to consider as to financial arrangements and requirements for any needed infrastructure improvements associated with the Kanata North Expansion Area;
g) present and future roles and needs of the South March community and the impact of development of any of the Kanata North Expansion Area lands on the South March community. Reassessment of the planned function of various components of the South March community may be necessary;
h) ability of the Kanata North Expansion Area to satisfy the Provincial Policy Statement.
9. Ensure that all new development within the urban area shown on Schedule A is
serviced entirely by the central systems for water supply and wastewater treatment.
Interim uses on private services may be permitted provided that it can be demonstrated to
the satisfaction of Council that such development:
a) can be adequately serviced by private services;
b) is of a minor nature, consists of a single building, comprising a commercial, institutional, or public use, or which consists of residential infilling within residential clusters, or is a farm severance as provided for in Section 7, Agriculture; [OMB Modification, APRIL 5, 1999]
c) will not compromise the longer-term development of the area for urban purposes on central services;
[OMB Modification, March 5, 1999]d) developments permitted under this policy will be required to pay for hook-up to central services when they become available.
Notwithstanding this policy, residential development consisting of single-detached dwellings on private individual services shall be permitted on Part Lot 10, Concession 1 (Rideau Front), City of Gloucester designated as Lot 36, Registrars Compiled Plan No. 904.
10. Not extend central services to the rural area except in exceptional circumstances to address a public health issue, in accordance with Section 10.3.7, or where an overall study has been completed to support the extension, in accordance with the policies of Section 10.3.8.
11. Review development inside and outside the Greenbelt, including the rural area, not less frequently than every five years and amend the objectives and policies of this Plan if necessary. [Ministerial Modification B-1, October 21, 1997]
2.5 POLICIES FOR DEVELOPMENT INSIDE THE GREENBELT
Development inside the Greenbelt can be supported in a number of ways in this Plan, including redesignations and policies on zonings, redevelopment, and servicing. In addition, Council actions not governed by this Plan, such as setting of development charges, can be used to pursue objectives of the Plan, provided they conform to provincial legislation. The following policies describe some of the key ways in which the RDS objectives for development inside the Greenbelt can be met.
Council shall:
2.6 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
(Section 2.6 is appealed insofar as this section relates to Stittsville) (Appeal 8)
The phasing of development is intended to minimise the need for new servicing expenditures while allowing for consumer choice, a competitive housing and land market, and economic development opportunities. By co-ordinating the timing of water and wastewater infrastructure improvements with overall demand and supporting the cost-effective provision of other Regional services, such as roads and transit, phasing of development will help provide an adequate supply of serviced urban land without triggering the need for costly transportation works required to service development in particular areas.
Development will occur in two phases.
Phase 1 dwelling unit capacity is based on an analysis of the water, wastewater and transportation infrastructure which is the most cost-effective to provide over approximately the next 10 years, to 2006, and how much residential capacity would be available in total with this infrastructure in place.
Phase 2 refers to additional development up to 2021. Phase 2 development does not anticipate that all urban-designated land would be consumed by 2021. In fact, based on projected development densities, land will be available for both residential and employment uses in all urban areas outside the Greenbelt after 2021. Consequently, additional development is possible beyond the horizon of the Plan, estimated to be within the ranges shown in Table 5.
The number of dwelling units for each phase is shown in Table 5.
Table 5
Servicing Capacities for Dwelling Units
| Urban Area | Estimated Built Units 1996 |
Existing
Capacity (1996)* |
Phase 1 | Phase
2 2021 |
Build-Out
Post 2021 |
| Inside the Greenbelt | 205,000 | 217,000 | 240,000 | 265,000- 277,000 |
277,000+ |
| Kanata Urban Centre |
14,500 | 18,000 | 22,500 | 32,000 | 35,000-38,000 |
| Orléans Urban Centre |
22,750 | 25,000 | 29,000 | 38,000 | 44,000-48,000 |
| Nepean South Urban Centre |
9,500 | 17,500 | 17,500 | 27,000 | 27,000-36,000 |
| Gloucester South Urban Centre** |
0 | 0 | 3,500 | 8,000 | 11,000-16,500 |
| Stittsville *** | 3,750 | 4,500 | 8,000 | 8,500 | 9,000-10,000 (Appeal 8,20, 28) |
| Leitrim | 0 | 0 | 1,500 | 2,500 | 4,000-5,000 |
[Ministerial Modification B-2, October 21, 1997]
Notes:
[OMB Modification, November 6, 1998]* All references to dwelling units include existing and potential new occupied units.
** The Gloucester SUC had very limited Regional road capacity in 1996.
*** With respect to Stittsville, the totals respecting Phase 1, Phase 2 and Build-Out Post 2021 are in force, on an interim basis, subject only to pending appeals seeking an increase thereto.
2.6.1 Policies
Council shall:
1. Provide servicing (trunk water, wastewater and transportation) to accommodate the dwelling unit capacities set out in Table 5 as Phase 1 and Phase 2 development.
2. Periodically review the development phasing provided for in Table 5 and, if required, adjust phasing based on the performance of individual areas with respect to such matters as:
a) actual rates of development;
b) use of transit and other non-auto modes of transportation;
c) levels of congestion on Regional roads and provincial highways serving individual areas;
d) rates of water consumption and wastewater flow;
e) levels of employment in relation to the objective to achieve a balance with households;
f) supply and demand for other relevant services.
3. Use its discretion to determine the sequence for development of land within the Urban Area shown on Schedule A, subject to phasing policies in this Plan. The designation of land as Urban Area on Schedule A does not oblige Council to provide infrastructure within the time frame of the Plan.
4. Have regard to Table 6 when setting spending priorities for major water, wastewater, road, and transit works in order to ensure that most of the infrastructure described in Table 6 is constructed or under construction by the year 2006. An amendment is not required for changes to Table 6.
5. Within each Urban Centre, including Stittsville and Leitrim, approve plans of subdivision and condominium so as to achieve a contiguous pattern of residential development, unless there are compelling reasons to the contrary.
Table 6
Key Infrastructure Projects for Phase 1 Developments
First Priority
| Area | Wastewater | Water | Transportation |
| Inside Greenbelt | · 3 Diversions · CSO Tunnel and Regulators |
· Watermain (Hurdman to Billings) · Expand Hurdman Bridge Pumping Station |
· West Transitway Phase 1 · Mackenzie King Bridge Transitway Station· Hawthorne Rd. (Hunt Club Rd. to Russell Rd.)· Airport Parkway/Hunt Club/Walkley ramps· Conroy Road widening (Hunt Club to Walkley Road)· Transit priority measures· Pilot rail rapid transit project· Pooleys BridgeRehabilitation · (Appeal 32) |
| Orléans Urban Centre | · Orléans-Cumberland Collector (pumping station and forcemain) · Gloucester-Cumberland rehabilitation· Cumberland gravity sewer extensionsOttawa River Sub- Trunk |
· Highway 17 shoulder bus lane (eastbound) | |
| Kanata Urban Centre and Stittsville | · Tri-Township Collector rehabilitation |
|
|
| Nepean South Urban Centre | · Gravity sewer extensions | · New elevated tank · Watermain - Greenbank Road to new tank |
· Fallowfield Park & Ride lot |
| Gloucester South Urban Centre | |||
| Leitrim | |||
| All Urban Areas | · Walking & cycling facility improvements included where
appropriate in the above projects · Walking & cycling facility improvements independent of the above projects |
Notes: All areas have large diameter internal watermain requirements not shown on this table. Phasing is approximate and actual timing depends on monitoring development over the 10-year time frame. First Priority is approximately up to 2001. Transportation works in progress as of December 1996 are not included.
Table 6
Key Infrastructure Projects for Phase 1 Developments
Second Priority
| Area | Wastewater | Water | Transportation |
| Inside Greenbelt |
· Cave Creek Collector replacement · Alvin Heights Collector replacement |
· Expand Carlington Heights Pumping Station · Ottawa South Pumping Station - add pumps |
· Southwest Transitway extension* · Airport Parkway twinning **· Bronson Avenue widening (Dunbar Bridge to Canal)· Transit priority measures· LeBreton Transitway station· (Appeal 32) |
| Orléans Urban Centre |
· Forest Valley pumping station, forcemain, gravity sewers · Cumberland gravity sewer extensions |
· Innes Road widening (Orléans Blvd. to Tenth Line Rd.) | |
| Kanata
Urban Centre and Stittsville |
· Hazeldean pumping station - add pumping capacity and forcemain · March area gravity sewer |
· New elevated tank · Watermain - Barrhaven to Kanata |
· Carling Ave. widening (March Rd. to Moodie Dr.) · Hazeldean Road widening |
| Nepean South Urban Centre | · Gravity sewer extensions | · Southwest Transitway extension* | |
| Gloucester South Urban Centre | · River Rd. widening (Limebank Rd. to Hunt Club Rd.) · Bowesville Rd. extension (Leitrim Rd. to Lester Rd.)· Airport Parkway twinning ** |
||
| Leitrim | · Gravity sewer extensions · Pumping station and forcemain |
· Expand South Gloucester pumping station | · Leitrim Park & Ride lot |
| All Urban Areas | · Walking & cycling facility improvements included where
appropriate in the above projects · Walking & cycling facility improvements independent of the above projects |
||
| Pickard Centre | · Outfall |
Notes: All areas have large diameter internal watermain requirements not shown on this Table. Phasing is approximate and actual timing depends on monitoring development over the 10-year time frame. Second Priority is approximately 2001-2006.
* The Southwest Transitway extension serves inside the Greenbelt and Nepean South Urban Centre.
** The Airport Parkway twinning serves inside the Greenbelt and Gloucester South Urban Centre and Leitrim.